NASA Astrobiology YouTube Channel Earnings Report & Research

To answer how much does NASA Astrobiology make, Branzly runs the channel's estimated 4.8K monthly views through the same ad revenue calculator used across the site: a Education RPM of $2.7-$6.8 from 2026 niche benchmarks, with the headline figure taken at the middle of that range ($4.8), the same RPM used in the home page calculator. That puts NASA Astrobiology YouTube ad revenue at roughly $13 to $33 per month, or $156 to $393 per year from AdSense alone.

RPM is what the channel actually keeps per 1,000 views after YouTube's 45% revenue share, unfilled ad inventory and ad blockers, which is why these NASA Astrobiology earnings figures sit far below the advertiser-side CPM quotes you may see elsewhere. Views from Tier 1 countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia pay the most, while Shorts views pay a fraction of long-form RPM.

On top of ad revenue, we assume one integrated-mention sponsorship per month priced on 806 average views per video at a Education cost-per-view rate of $0.01 with a 1.2× niche multiplier — the identical model in our sponsorship calculator. That suggests a NASA Astrobiology sponsored video is worth about $10 to $19, with a fair midpoint near $14.

Sponsorship pricing follows views and engagement, not subscriber count, so a large channel with a quiet video is still only paid for the views that video earns. Brands asking "how much does it cost to sponsor NASA Astrobiology?" should expect dedicated videos to cost two to three times an integrated mention.

Channel-level deals work differently again. A retainer is an ongoing fee for a set of deliverables each month, not the sum of every slot the channel could sell, so pricing follows published size bands. With 26.9K subscribers, NASA Astrobiology sits in the Micro (10K-100K subs) band, where retainers typically run $1,000 to $5,000 a month. Niche demand, engagement, cadence across 6 uploads a month and how much of the audience watches each upload decide where in that band a deal lands. Spread back across uploads, that adds about $443 of value to each video.

Put simply, NASA Astrobiology YouTube earnings are estimated at roughly $1,882 to $3,770 per month when ad revenue, one sponsored integrated mention and a retainer are combined, or about $22,580 to $45,240 per year. Channels that publish more sponsored videos, sell merchandise or courses, run memberships, or earn affiliate commissions typically make more than this range.

Net worth estimates for YouTubers like NASA Astrobiology usually start from several years of this yearly income, minus taxes, team costs and production spend. Treat any NASA Astrobiology net worth figure as a planning range, not a disclosed number.

NASA Astrobiology (@nasaastrobiology) is a education YouTube channel that has published 1,063 videos and accumulated 856,388 lifetime views from an audience of 26,900 subscribers. The channel was created in February 2012, which makes it roughly 14 years and 9 months old, and it continues to publish content for viewers interested in education topics. In the creator's own words: "Astrobiology research sponsored by NASA focuses on three basic questions: How does life begin and evolve? Does life exist elsewhere in the Universe? How do we search for life in the Universe? Over the past 50 years, astrobiologists have uncovered myriad clues to answering these Big Questions. https://science.nasa.gov/astrobiology/" Branzly analyses NASA Astrobiology using public YouTube data so creators, brands and media buyers can understand the channel's size, output and likely earning power before they reach out, benchmark against it, or plan a collaboration.

NASA Astrobiology has been on YouTube for approximately 14 years and 9 months, starting in February 2012. Across that period the channel has averaged around 76 uploads per year, which gives a useful signal about publishing consistency: channels that maintain a steady cadence typically build stronger session watch time and more predictable sponsorship inventory than channels that upload in bursts. Longevity also matters for advertisers, because an established back catalogue keeps generating views long after each video's launch week. With 1,063 videos in the library, NASA Astrobiology earns a meaningful share of its monthly views from older content rather than from new uploads alone, and that evergreen tail is one reason estimated revenue for education channels can stay stable between releases.

NASA Astrobiology currently has 26,900 subscribers, a figure that places the channel in the growing creator tier of YouTube creators. Total channel views stand at 856,388, and average views per video sit at approximately 806. The ratio of lifetime views to subscribers is about 31.8 views for every subscriber, which indicates an audience that is concentrated in the channel's regular, subscribed viewers. Branzly estimates recent activity at roughly 4,811 views per month based on the channel's most recent uploads and publishing history, which is the number our ad revenue calculator uses to model earnings.

The most-watched long-form video currently visible for NASA Astrobiology is "NASA's Our Alien Earth: The Ancient Isua Greenstone Belt, Greenland" with 12,161 views. On the Shorts side, "Mathematics is NOT the Language of the Universe, It's How We Understand It with Dr. Sara Walker" leads with 11,818 views. Top-performing titles are worth studying because they reveal which hooks, formats and topics the algorithm rewards for this audience. For brands, they also show the realistic ceiling of a sponsored placement: a dedicated integration on a channel of this size will usually land somewhere between the average video performance of 806 views and the outliers shown above.

Based on an estimated 4,811 monthly views and typical education CPM ranges, NASA Astrobiology could earn roughly $12 to $32 per month from YouTube ad revenue, or approximately $155 to $392 per year. These figures reflect the AdSense share only. Most channels of this size also earn from brand sponsorships, affiliate links, memberships, merchandise and product sales, so total creator income is commonly several times the advertising estimate. Sponsorship value is usually priced per view rather than per thousand impressions, and education audiences typically command mid-range rates because of advertiser demand in that vertical.

Branzly classifies NASA Astrobiology under the Education category using the channel's description, keywords, topic signals and the language of its best-performing uploads. Category matters more than raw subscriber count when estimating revenue: a education channel attracts a specific set of advertisers, and CPMs vary widely between verticals such as finance, software, education, gaming and entertainment. The channel lists US as its primary country, which further shapes its CPM because advertiser spend differs sharply between geographies. Public channel keywords include nasa, astrobiology, institute, nai, space, earth, exploration, science, which supports this classification. Use the Branzly ad revenue, sponsorship and financial freedom calculators to model how a channel like NASA Astrobiology converts views into monthly income, sponsorship pricing and long-term wealth.

Every figure on this page comes from the public YouTube Data API, refreshed each time NASA Astrobiology is searched on Branzly. Subscriber counts, view counts and video counts are reported directly by YouTube. Monthly views are an estimate: YouTube does not publish per-month analytics for channels you do not own, so Branzly reconstructs recent performance from the views of the channel's latest uploads, falling back to lifetime views divided by channel age when recent data is sparse. Revenue ranges are modelled estimates, not disclosed earnings, and actual payouts depend on monetisation status, watch time, ad formats, seasonality, audience geography and YouTube's revenue share. Nothing on this page is financial advice, and Branzly is not affiliated with or endorsed by NASA Astrobiology or YouTube.

Education channels like NASA Astrobiology sit in the Education RPM bracket. Advertisers pay more for audiences that buy — finance, business and tech pay the highest rates, while entertainment, gaming and music rely on huge view volume. Seasonality matters too: Q4 ad rates commonly run 30–50% higher than January.

Every figure on this NASA Astrobiology channel earnings report comes from public YouTube Data API statistics — subscribers, lifetime views, video count and recent upload performance — refreshed when the report is opened. Estimates are modelled, not disclosed income, and not financial advice. Want to test your own assumptions? Open the YouTube money calculator or browse brands that already sponsor similar creators in the sponsors directory.